Judgment
Friday, August 29th, 2008 2:51 PM by Dan Slater(Cross-Posted to DemNotes at www.DemNotes.com)
For the life of me, I’m at a loss.
The Republican Party used to be pretty smart politically. They used to make good decisions — at least where campaigns are concerned.
But today’s selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to be John McCain’s runningmate may go down as the worst political judgment in the modern history of Presidential politics.
First, there’s the fact that he’s picked the head of the most corrupt state Republican Party in America, and that’s saying something! She came in as a reformer, but she’s now under investigation herself. She’s supportive of folks like Ted Stevens and Don Young, and even when she promised to open up the decision-making process on a pipeline in Alaska, she ended up just holding closed-door meetings with the energy industry and making those decisions without the public’s presence. Sound familiar?
Then there’s the experience issue. John McCain has seemingly spent every second on the stump slamming Senator Obama about his experience. Senator Obama has countered that this is about judgment, and all the experience in the world can’t help John McCain’s poor judgment. Well, what we learned today was that judgment is really the key issue, not experience. John McCain picked a second-year (YEAR, not term) governor of the second-smallest state in the country whose only other key experience politically was being mayor of a town of 8000.
Wow. That’s bold. But it also shows a complete lack of judgment by Senator John McCain.
Then there’s the actual policy positions of Sarah Palin. She’s rabidly anti-choice. She thinks global warming is a myth. She believes in creationism and wants it taught in schools as a science. For pete’s sake, in 2000, she didn’t even support John McCain! Who did she support? Not George W. Bush. She supported Pat Buchanan!!!!
Now, it is rather obvious that John McCain is making a rather naked attempt to go after Hillary Clinton supporters who are not quite all the way there toward supporting Barack Obama. But in doing so, he tragically misses the point. Folks weren’t supporting Hillary Clinton because she was a woman; instead, they were supporting her because she had a history of service to America that included fighting for causes important today, such as health care and education. To think Clinton supporters are some sort of knee-jerk supporters of anybody with double-x chromosomes is an insult to those individuals — and from the initial response to the selection, many are showing their disgust with such a poor decision by John McCain.
Even if going after Clinton supporters was a good strategy, the judgment shown by John McCain in picking Palin over other Republican women is simarly poor. Sure, he’s probably wrapped up Alaska’s 3 electoral votes, but if he couldn’t win those, it was going to be a landslide anyway. But what about Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas? What about Condoleeza Rice? What about former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman? Heck, even picking Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina would have been a better pick. To pick Gov. Palin over these simply shows more poor judgment by John McCain.
This morning, I participated in a press conference to celebrate John McCain’s birthday. We were at The Rialto on 16th Street, and drew a nice small crowd. Pat Waak, state chair, opened up the press conference behind a brightly-lit birthday cake, and noted that John McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin is simply “more of the same”. I went next and said much of what I’ve written above. Rep. Mark Ferrandino went next and talked about how the way Gov. Palin has governed Alaska seems an awful lot like the last 8 years of this President. Finally, AFL-CIO president Mike Cerbo talked about the failures of Gov. Palin for working families.
I’m going to try to relax for a little while and enjoy Denver. I’ll write more about my Convention experience later.